Robert J. Steinfeld, “Possessions and you may Suffrage in the early Western Republic,” Stanford Legislation Remark 41, no. 2 (January 1989): 356, 364; Nancy F. Cott, “Relationships and Ladies Citizenship in the us, 1830–1934,” American Historical Feedback 103, zero. 5 (December 1998): 1451–1454.
The women just who typed the newest anti-suffrage petition to Congress had written it from the article profiles off Godey’s Lady’s Guide and you can Journal, a famous monthly periodical infamous for its campaign from just what historians provides entitled “the cult from domesticity,” in order to garner tens and thousands of signatures for its presentation so you can Congress
Stephanie McCurry, “Both Confronts away from Republicanism: Gender and you may Proslavery Government inside Antebellum Sc,” Log from Western easternhoneys kredileri Records 78, no. cuatro (March 1992): 1252–1259, 1263–1264.
William J. Novak, “The latest Judge Conversion of Citizenship during the 19th-Century America,” within the T the guy Democratic Feel: Brand new Guidelines in the American Political Background , ed. Novak, and you will Julian Elizabeth. Zelizer (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Drive, 2003), 93–98, 105–112.
Ellen Carol DuBois, “Outgrowing the latest Lightweight of one’s Dads: Equivalent Rights, Woman suffrage, in addition to You Composition, 1820–1878,” Record from Western Record 74, no. 3 ( Winkler, “A revolution Too quickly: Lady Suffragists and ‘Way of life Constitution,’” New york College or university Laws Remark 76, zero. 5 (2001): 1456–1526.
Faye Age. Dudden, Assaulting Opportunity: The latest Challenge more than Woman-suffrage and Black colored Suffrage from inside the Reconstruction America (New york: Oxford College Force, 2011), 124; to the anti-suffragists in the Washington, DC, get a hold of Susan Age. Marshall, Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and you will Classification regarding the Venture facing Woman-suffrage (Madison: School of Wisconsin Push, 1997) , 19–23.
The fresh new petitioners was indeed culturally and you may politically influential feminine. Phelps did not indication this new petition, however, she publicized they and probably place it to have book from inside the Godey’s. Hitched anti-suffrage female tend to used the brand new culture of being identified by Mrs. [husband’s full name], a personal meeting that mirrored coverture, nearest and dearest descent, and societal updates. Almira Lincoln Phelps, “Woman’s Legal rights: A serious Course versus the fresh Expansion of your Suffrage-Target into the Feminine of the nation,” New york Times, March 27, 1871; Marshall, Splintered Sisterhood, 20; “An excellent Uniform Divorce proceedings Law-The Path on Anti-Suffrage Woman,” Chi town Tribune, November dos, 1871; Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan Brownell Anthony, and you may Matilda Joslyn Gage, eds., Reputation for Woman suffrage, vol. step three, 1861–1876 (Nyc: Fowler & Better, 1882), 494–495; For the petitions and remonstrances, come across Susan Zaeske, Signatures off Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery, and you will Ladies Political Label (Church Slope: College regarding Vermont Force, 2003).
Caroline Fairchild Corbin, Characters out of a chimney-Corner: A Plea having Natural Hopes and you can Polite Connections ranging from Men and you can Women (Chicago: Fergus, 1886), quoted in Report out of Senate Look for Panel for the Woman-suffrage during the “Viewpoints of Fraction” [to Supplement S. Res. 5], 49th Cong., next sess., S. Rept. 70, step 1 (April 31, 1886); Rix, “Gender and you will Reconstitution,” 89.
Congressional Number, 47th Cong., first sess., 229 (1881), cited during the Siegel, “She the individuals,” 1001. John Tyler Morgan try an old Confederate brigadier general, an excellent descendant out of President John Tyler regarding Virginia, and a designer off white supremacy for the Alabama. Come across Encyclopedia off Alabama .
Meg Jacobs, William J
Siegel, “She the people,” 1000n160, 1003; towards the “redemption of Northern,” select Keyssar, To Choose, 96–138. Due to the fact Keyssar notes, by the middle-1870s, a significant number of personal intellectuals and you will politicians lamented brand new use off common penis suffrage regarding the aftermath of the Civil Conflict, in the course of account out-of Reconstruction’s failures and the go up away from immigration, industrialization, the latest governmental machines, and you may change motions. Wanting it impracticable so you’re able to restriction penis suffrage, north opponents regarding democracy turned in order to managing the regularity, procedures, and range of governmental concerns inside the regional and you may county elections and you can enacting voter registration guidelines to manage the fresh new electorate. A north and you can west variation of southern area disfranchisement, these processes regarding reducing democratic contribution and you will direct icon appeared significantly less than expanding scrutiny regarding 1890s–1910s, fueling besides Populism as well as woman-suffrage as an element of a bigger change coalition.